Goodbye Glasgow

Hayford Mills 001

We’re settling into our new home. Our first impression: we’ve just had the best night’s sleep we’ve had in several years. Even though the house is in chaos, we’re still taking the time to relax, look out the windows, and enjoy the peace of not living in the middle of the city.

The kitchen is in disarray, so there won’t be much in the way of experimental cooking taking place until we can manage to pack up the dishes and tchotchkes which came with the house. Yes: this house came fully furnished … and apparently the owner has a penchant for decorating, because there are even spare decorations tucked away in drawers throughout the house. So, rather than simply unpacking, we’re doing a mix: unpacking our things and packing hers up to load into the garage.

Hayford Mills 005

When we’re not tripping over boxes in the kitchen, though, we’re looking out at our garden … and realizing that we really do need to get organized so that we can have a few meals out there before the weather turns cold and mucky again. This morning the table was in full sun, but it was still too chilly to be out there without coats, which are packed somewhere still. We figure that the unpacking will take a few weeks. Hopefully we’ll get some use out of the space before Winter sets in.

Tomorrow morning we’ll be walking to D’s work – a walk of just under a mile, one way. Between our home and work is all residential, with a footbridge over the motorway. There are no shops, nor even any major roads to cross except for via that footbridge. It’s an amazing difference from where we’d been.

Cambusbarron itself has only five or six shops for the few thousand people who live here. We’ve gone to the opposite extreme from Glasgow: from a huge, sprawling, filthy city to a tiny village. We believe we’re seeing a better side of Scotland.

The sun is streaming into the living room, and we’re feeling lazy. The unpacking can wait awhile – there are books to read, and maybe even naps to be taken.

-D & T

This Land is Your Land, Oh, Wait. Not Really.

Glasgow Merchant City D 14

Ah, August. Time of flooded festivals and The Fringe and in George Square it’s the time of movie-making frenzy. Our usually placid square has been carved up, fenced off, and is a major traffic causer. Why? Two words. Brad. Pitt.

He’s makin’ a zombie movie.

Glasgow Merchant City D 17

This gets a BIG eye roll around these parts. Last year, in the service of being a judge for a book award, T. had to read one and later complained, “The whole zombie thing has never to me made sense. How come the zombies never eat each other? And yeah, we’re omnivores and designed to be that way, but how does a person spontaneously develop a craving for brains, and how does one’s (undead) digestive system suddenly deal with eating people raw? I mean, seriously. Zombie outbreaks happen, and you never see people rolling around in agony and dying of bowel flux and dehydration. Sorry. That’s unspeakably gross. But I have trouble suspending disbelief about some things.”

Neither could she care less about Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, and their six U.N. representative children they’ve hauled up from London for the month.

Glasgow Merchant City D 21

However! Should you care, the movie is called World War Z, and is apparently nothing like the book (movies never are) which allegedly takes place in Philadelphia. Having never been to Philly, we have no idea if it looks the same, but frankly throwing up a few street signs, American traffic lights and scattering yellow cabs and SWAT and police vehicles around a Scottish city doesn’t exactly make it look American. On the other hand, those things are like adding spices to a dish; they’re tiny touches that no one will notice but which will make a difference. Unless you’re from Glasgow, and then George Square will still look a lot like …George Square.

It’s all in good fun, though. Except to the cab drivers, who would like to set the whole bunch of them on fire for snarling up the traffic.

Ah, well. In four days, none of this will be our problem anyway. Woot!

42 Months. On to Greener Pastures (literally – they’re behind the new house)

View from Skypark 178

So, now that the PhD thing is winding down (when will it end?!), I’ve gotten myself a new job: Lead Developer and Technical Architect at Cloud Street, Ltd.. Today was my last day at V.Ships. I’ve been with them half-time for the past 42 months (yes, I’ve counted), leaving behind a massive legacy of code: more than 60,000 lines of Visual Basic .NET code and more than 20,000 lines of Transact SQL code just for one project. Skip the next paragraph if you’re not into the details of what makes a programmer (read: technical writer) happy.

I’ve spent the past two weeks handing that code over to another developer and enjoyed the time immensely. Consider it a code review but with the incentive that if the other guy doesn’t understand it, well, he’s either going to need to email me for an explanation or he’s going to have to spend some time to figure it out. It’s a massive code-base, most of it hand-coded. One stored procedure alone is nearly 5,000 lines of code. To top it off: many of the stored procedures perform operations on entire sets of data rather than operations on individual rows. Set-based operations are some of the most mind-bending things to do in a database, particularly when using things like set multiplication (a.k.a. Cartesian Products). Not only are there set-based operations, but there are binary operations that I truly struggled to explain (but which drive the whole application). The user interface uses inheritance, polymorphism, overrides, shadowing, multithreading … basically, any Object-Oriented technique you can think of (except for being able to inherit from multiple base classes – stupid .NET!), the UI uses. All in all, I’m very proud of the code-base, and truly had fun watching somebody else try to grasp the complicated concepts involved in it. Best of all, I guess, is that it’s used around the world, every day, and has helped the business reduce their invoice payment and issuing process from more than a month to something like 1/2 of an hour; that’s best for the company, but to me, the production of elegant, efficient, useful code is the payoff. Having someone else appreciate it is a tremendous validation of my efforts.

This coming Monday means a new start, at a new company, where I’ll be able to have an impact. The company is switching over from building their user interfaces in Microsoft Access to building things in .NET. As their lead developer / technical architect I get to shape how development will be done, and to help build a code-base which will be used for years to come. Best of all, though, is that they’re a consultancy: I’ll be able to build a variety of software, hand it over to the clients, and not have to deal much with support of those applications. So, it’ll be a combination of teaching programming techniques and creating new applications – truly, I’m looking forward to it.

Next weekend we move up to Cambusbarron, to a townhouse which looks out over a greenbelt. There will not be people fighting outside our bedroom window. There will not be cars trying to get into a petrol station. There will not be people singing as they make their way home from the pub at 3 a.m. Anyone who’s familiar with the area says that we’ll have trouble sleeping because it will be too quiet. Watch us! The house is less than a mile from the office, most of which is on quiet, residential streets. The house has double-paned windows (it was built around 2000), it has thermostats (yes!), and it has a garden. The change, from living in Glasgow, is truly radical. We’re looking forward to it immensely!

So, it’s now Friday evening, we’re settling in to have a quiet evening, and will be spending the weekend packing things up for the move. Radical change is in store for us, and we’re looking forward to it. After living in the current flat for over 2 years, it’s about time to have someplace new, to have different things to photograph, and to get back to living quiet lives.

I will miss seeing the people absailing down the side of the building washing windows in the rain, though. What a job!

-D

Religion, Secularism & Etc: thoughts for a Friday

2001 Santa Rosa 002

You’ll forgive us if we stray from merely reporting on our lives sometimes to just giving you a taste of what we’re thinking about. These days, now that D.’s Big Paper is done (mostly – the supervisors are still reading it one last time before it goes to committee), he still finds that he tends to think in… er, paragraphs. He reads widely and thinks a lot, and generally confines himself to sharing articles and thoughts with T. — and now you.

Aren’t you lucky?

So, we happened across an article entitled, “Going Godless: Does Secularism Make People More Ethical?” Awesome title, and certain to grab attention. Go away, now, and read it. Then we’ll discuss.

  *hums Jeopardy! theme*

OK, good, you’re back. The gist of the piece, for those people who apparently cannot follow directions (shame, you non-readers), is a discussion of religion in various places, the fact that many religions are losing adherents, and the question of whether or not rejecting organized religion makes one more ethical. The article explores a report made by The Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture at Trinity College, Connecticut.

The upshot of the study from the Institute: no, rejecting organized religion doesn’t make one more ethical at all, or at least that hasn’t been proven. It’s not a cause/effect issue. However the study directed up researcher Barry Kosmin did find that the secular people polled were more ethically inclined than the religious people polled. So, what is it about the “secularists” which caused them to be more ethical? Perhaps it’s their having actually thought about what makes something “right” or “wrong.” Belief, after all, doesn’t constitute “knowledge” – case in point: just because you believe in UFO’s doesn’t make them real, does it?

Perhaps critical thinkers (regardless of whether they be atheist / agnostic / religious) are more ethical. Maybe those who actually consider whether something is right or wrong are more ethical because they have gone beyond the “belief” stage and into the “knowing” stage of personal knowledge: they have gone through a process of reasoning, which is different from just believing something. Now, granted, you don’t want to reason your way through something like gravity – you’d better just believe in it, or you’ll be broken and bruised before you know it. Somethings do require belief – but maybe we believe strongly in gravity because we’ve seen some small examples of its truths. Does that follow in religious or secular thought?

Hummingbird 08

When you’re a child, you have to take everyone’s word for how the world works. Whether it’s your schoolmates or your parents, pretty much everyone who sounds like they’re an authority is, at least for five or ten minutes, believed. However, as an adult, many people struggle with the idea of accepting the opinion of some dudes (yes – they were all men) who wrote several thousands of years ago about how they felt the world should work — and many times advocating stoning for those who didn’t agree. Should adults – religious or non – accept anybody’s opinion on what is “right?”

Maybe… no, actually. Surprised? You might be, considering that many of you know us to be religious people. However, if you, like everyone else on earth have a.) freedom of choice, b.) the ability to think, you can think things through and weigh all of the possibilities, and come up with your own opinions. Whether that makes you a “secularist” or not, well, maybe that’s entirely a matter of labeling. After all, religious people can read and study and still think for themselves.

Despite the study, maybe there isn’t such a gap between “religious” and “secular” people. Some religions ask people to believe things which are untrue or which just aren’t ethical by any meaning of the word — as a matter of belief. Consider the ministers, who, each time there’s a natural disaster, bring up some weird correlation between that nation and somehow displeasing God. Really? And where is their proof? But their members are expected to believe without any facts… and often they do, going along wholeheartedly with disparaging a people who are already beaten down and suffering from fire, earthquake, tsunami, or floods. That we don’t agree with the blind-belief thing doesn’t mean that we endorse disbelieving in God – not by any means – but it sometimes seems like those of us who believe in thinking as well as God are vanishingly few.

2006 Yosemite 072

The study lists secular beliefs as things like believing in supporting the environment, treating people of different gender and ethnicities with kindness beyond tolerance, and opposing war. One really weird thing the study noted is that many secular people have more knowledge about religious beliefs than religious people. …hm. Which reminds us of a quote:

They’re trained to believe, not to know. Belief can be manipulated. Only knowledge is dangerous. – Frank Herbert, Dune Messiah

To recap: We believe in God. However, we believe that ethics should be considered, contemplated, and should be coherent. Does that make us “secularists?” Or simply thinking human beings? It just doesn’t seem very wise – or Godly – to fear thinking. But for some people, the very idea spells t-r-o-u-b-l-e.

And that’s our thoughts for a Friday afternoon.

Now, talk amongst yourselves…

-D & T

In Which We Are Awash in Boxes, and Our Housekeeping SkilIs Are Disparaged

Serendipitous Sourdough 5

You’ll have noted the long pauses in blog entries. The reason? We’re busily packing…

One of the things you never remember about moving is how …just… grubby the whole enterprise ends up being. It’s not that you never clean beneath your couches — we do, with a dust mop, at minimum on a weekly basis. It’s just that dust is a sneaky, sneaky thing, and like its namesake bunnies which breed horrifyingly quickly, it gets behind furniture and quietly gives birth. Add to it that the Georgian date of the building, the fact that they’re doing dig-up-the-sidewalks type of construction again just across the street (in front of Bridget’s old flat), and that we have single-paned windows that don’t really seal, and you get drifts of sand and flakes of paint along with the dust and the general human sheddings of dander, skin, and hair.

Remember how when you were little, sometimes certain parts of the floor were lava and you had to jump across? Yeah, well, when one is moving, at times the whole house is deemed lava-land. We want to perch atop our boxes and stare down in dismay. Instead we… clean. And clean. And clean again, as each new crop of dust bunnies (or slut’s wool, as T’s grandma used to call it – a bit more pejorative, that) reveals itself… because of course the property manager insists on running herds of potential renters through while we’re trying to pack everything away, and T. still grimaces when she remembers being teased once by the property inspector about a dusty baseboard.

It’s hard for us to see how finding new renters so soon is reasonable, as we’ve been in this flat for over two years. In the part of the U.S. where we’re from, the law states that after one year, an apartment has to be freshly painted, and the floors cleaned for the next tenants – it’s more of a health/safety law than anything else, but it does mean that there are frequently brightened apartments. Here, that’s not the law; the owner essentially does what they want, and in this case, the owner wants money, and so farewell to the idea of someone figuring out, once and for all, what is wrong with the boiler — we’re considering leaving the wooden spoon we use to jimmy the reset switch, but have a feeling that probably won’t help; farewell to the idea of scraping away the paint from the wooden windowsills and redoing them. Farewell to thoroughly cleaning the blinds and the drapes and removing the strange discolorations and molds from the ceiling where the tenant can’t reach. Just… shove in the next crop. ::sigh::

Lynedoch Crescent D 422

When last we spoke on the topic – in June – we thought we were moving, but had no idea where we were going, and D. was sending out résumés in stacks. To Canada, to the U.S., to various companies with offices in Puerto Rico, the British Virgin Islands, — he was taking interest in both academic and tech positions everywhere. To our surprise, there wasn’t a lot of response. While the economy is indeed job-poor, we thought that it would be fairly simple to find something acceptable… but companies are being cagey and going with closer candidates for shorter periods of time with more money, but no benefits. Universities have been mildly interested, but of course they want people with degrees-in-hand who don’t have any thought of tenure or anything but adjunct positions. After about four months of trying, D. realized that a.) since his grades for the PhD don’t post until December, job-hunting will be easier in January and b.) despite the fact that his contract was, on paper at least, meant to last ’til September, he’d worked himself out of work, and needed to rethink things in order to keep the roof over our heads. We realized that maybe it wasn’t yet time to leave this place, no matter what we thought we wanted.

Almost as soon as we came to this conclusion, a woman from a nearby town phoned and mentioned that she had seen D’s resume somewhere, and requested that he come and interview in Stirling at her company, forty minutes away. And just like that, things came together. D. starts the job next week as the head of the developers, so he’ll get to mentor and teach and do all those things he loves for as long we we’re here.

Meanwhile: the new place has double paned windows, is made of plain old brick instead of sandstone, and was built within the current century. This means it will hopefully breed less dust in the back corners of things, but there’s no guarantee on this. Flat hunting was trickier with the distances and having to take the train to all appointments, but we managed. We were too flustered to take any pictures, but it’s in a quiet little village called Cambusbarron and the townhouse is nestled next to picturesque woolen mills from the 1830’s.

The townhouse is tall and narrow like a treehouse – a narrow central stairway twists up with rooms branching off. First, downstairs the garage and a library (or what will be the library), with shower/toilet/sink combo and a door to a small backyard. The next floor has a lovely kitchen/living room open up in a bubble of light from north and south, which means those will be lighted rooms in the dark of winter as well as now. The full back wall of the kitchen is windows, as well as there being picture windows in the living room, to overlook the lovely fenced yard and larger greenbelt in the back. Up a floor from there are an office and a very tiny room which literally has only room for a table – we’ll make it a work room – a full bathroom, as well as another shower room for the master bedroom. (So now we’ve gone from one bathroom for the last several years, to three. Why we have all of this largess now…) Pictures to come soon.

Kelvingrove Park 390

But, for now, all of that quiet and order of the new place is but a dream. Before us are ten more days of living with boxes and sorting things into piles of what goes, and what goes out to Oxfam. Right now, we ADORE Oxfam, and hope they enjoy the donation of paperbacks and kitchen stuff and nice-but-under-used clothing which will soon be theirs.

Meanwhile, D. has received some last changes to make to his thesis / dissertation thing before submitting it. Yes, you thought he had submitted it! So did he, but his advisers sprang into action suddenly and want to be sure it’s perfect before it goes on to the larger committee.

Ummmm…yeah. You see there’s a lot being left unsaid, and since this is a family blog, we’ll leave it that way. The bottom line to this sudden influx of input is that the date of the oral exams is irretrievably inching its way toward an October date, not a September one as was originally planned to facilitate an out-of-country student. It really is just as well that D. has a job in this country still, or he’d have to be flying back for exams, which would be an expensive nuisance. The way this whole process has gone has been a nuisance, but we keep reminding ourselves that soon it will be done, and D. will be the latest (and most unique) Dr. M.

That’s the news from Lake Glasgow, where the women are cranky, the house is filthy, and the men are running out of strapping tape…

Copyright, Patent, and why Software doesn’t fit

I missed an article about Patents in my last “Links” post. Patents are about to become a bigger problem quotes from two historically-significant inventors: Benjamin Franklin and Johannes Salk. With regards to his stove, Ben Franklin refused to enforce his patent, saying:

“That as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously.”

Salk, when asked, “Who owns the patent on this vaccine [against Polio]?” replied:

“Well, the people, I would say. There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?”

In the copyright and patent systems, copyright has to do with “creative works” which include such odd creatures as “graphic designs” and “trademarks” and even concepts. Patent has also to do with concepts, and extends to such nonphysical things as software, which is … distinctly odd, so far as I can see, particularly since software code isn’t really a physical device, and is words; yet software code isn’t really words, it’s a set of instructions, very much like a recipe, and recipes are not protected by either patent or copyright.

For me, the problem in fitting software into either copyright or patent comes down to this: what is “the essence” of what is being protected?

In a copyrighted work, the owner is allowed to sell that work. Now, “that work” is what, exactly? In the case of printed music, “that work” is actually the typography – it is not the notes; after all, how can you copyright notes? In the case of performed music, it is actually any recording made which is subject to copyright, not the performance itself (although there may be restrictions regarding recording, as dictated by other laws, etc.). In the case of a printed work, “that work” is the words themselves and not the typography. These “creative works” are covered by copyright and not by patents. In the case of copyrighted works, what’s protected is a creative work which is an end product constructed by a human being.

Patents cover things: a special typographical process, a special recording device. Patents are similar to copyrights in that they protect the owner for a period of time, with the specific intent that the owner use that time to use the device to make money. Patents, though, should not cover the same types of creative works as copyright; the intent of each system is different. In the case of patented works, patents are issued on the design of a product such that the product which fulfills that design is what is protected from anyone else using that same design. This is where the two systems really differ: copyright is about end products generated by humans, patent is about designs for end products.

So, where does software fit into the picture? Software is patented, currently, so … nobody can copy the same set of instructions as protected by patent. This is where “obvious” comes into play, because software patents should cover source-code (the “design” for the product) and that source-code should not be “obvious” to anyone else in a similar line of work. But when you consider that 1) any given computer language is designed to operate in a certain way and 2) any given task to be performed by an application is very likely to be an “obvious solution” to such a problem, well, how can a patent be issued?

Software patents also don’t seem quite to fit into the “patents” system because frequently the patent granted isn’t upon source-code, but upon higher-level concepts such as “streaming video to a mobile phone.” The source-code never comes into play; rather, the idea is what is being protected, which is quite silly: how can an idea be non-obvious, and how can it be that such patents are issued without detailed designs for making them work (i.e., the source-code)?

Perhaps source-code, which seeks to solve a certain problem, should be granted copyright instead? Well … this comes up against the problem that source-code doesn’t really seem like a creative work in the same way as, say, a novel would. Also, because source-code is subject to a very limited set of grammar and syntax, and is actually a set of instructions for a finished product rather than a finished product in and of itself, source-code seems more like something which would fall under a patent.

However, if source-code is patented, it would need to meet the non-obvious criterion, which it certainly does not.

There’s also the last perversion of the software patent system which is what upsets most: software patents aren’t used to make things for sale which provide income; rather, they are used to prevent others from doing so or to extort massive amounts of cash from those who try.

Software patents should not be valid. Software copyrights should not be, either. Software source-code does not fit into the existing system, period.

In expanding the patent and copyright systems to overlap, the definition of each has been blurred beyond the intent of the terms, and laws have been stretched to “protect” the “owners” of such ideas.

How is it that one can “own” an idea (or a recipe)? Well, one may enslave the people who try to make use of it, or may brutalize them into financial ruin. Such is a very common use of modern copyright and patent law: the suppression of ideas.

-D

Links

Well, folks, so much for the idea of getting these out more frequently, so this is a bit of a long bunch of links. It seems I’m going to need to rethink how I go about putting these links together, or perhaps to find some means of compiling comments simultaneously with saving links, so that it’s easier to get a post together from a bunch of links. I’m not sure where I’ll go with it, but I’ll get around to re-writing the script which aggregates them for me at some point so that I can pull my comments together.
Continue reading “Links”

Photo Information

It is with great regret that I’ve set Flickr to hide the EXIF information from our photos. This has been forced by the fact that the U.S. will be trying to use this information to be evil. I’ll be looking into removing all of our EXIF information from Flickr. What a horror. I’d like to tell you what aperture / exposure I used … but I can’t remove the other information from the photos. So, I’ll be stripping it all from the photos from this point forward. I. Am. So. Incensed. I cannot even express the level of anger.

-D

They Still Have Little Tails

Back in April, T’s buddy Leila the Great raved quietly about a quinoa dish she’d made, that her honey, Josh, wouldn’t eat, because of the little tails. T. was dismayed by this, because she disliked quinoa for the same reason, plus a few reasons more, but she hates agreeing with Josh about anything, so decided that this attitude simply would not do. She took it upon herself to buy a several small bags of quinoa and get to know it.

Well. It was a good idea, anyway. But, after maybe one stir-fry meal where we used it as a rice substitute, it sat in its sealed little container and stared at us. And we …looked up at the ceiling and whistled.

Quinoa Salad 1

Enter better weather, months later, and a plethora of avocados, pear tomatoes, and Salad of Bounty items. Enter a serendipitous the-cupboards-are-bare supper, and voilá – a stupendously tasty Salad of Excellence ™ (not to be confused with the Bean B. Salad of Awesome ™ ). We scarfed up our dinner salad, then got up early to try and recreate it to send off for D’s lunch. Salad of Excellence ™ is never quite the same twice, but chunks of avocado, corn, tomatoes, cilantro (or coriander, if you’re Scottish), and beans (we’d prefer pintos or black, but had kidney on hand) are the main notes. Add chunks of cheese, grilled asparagus tips, tangy green olives, charred summer squash, or julienned green beans. For those in need of more “padding” to this single-dish meal, don’t forget to chop your lettuce (cabbage? greens?), sliver your carrots, and other basic salad fare to stretch the dish. Another trick is in the dressing – we use plain vinegar, olive oil, mustard, and Thai green curry paste. The flavored vinegar we chose specially from our local Asian market to add a touch of sweetness – it contains pineapple juice!

One trick that people who try quinoa might not know is that before cooking it, it’s best to let it soak for fifteen minutes, drain and rinse it, and then cook it. Quinoa has a strongly grassy/grain-y smell, which can be off-putting. Soaking it will dilute some of that smell, and reduce the soapy, bitter flavor of the saponin which is naturally present on the grain. Soaking away the saponin will help you digest quinoa, otherwise it causes lower GI irritation, and acts as a laxative… This is good information which would have helped us get along with quinoa a lot sooner!

Hot quinoa and cool veg, or cool quinoa and hot veg – either way and any way, this is a tasty salad, mixing the strange protein-laden South American grain with the best summer produce you can find. And there are plenty more quinoa recipes to try, like pancakes, muffins and crumbles! We tried it as a breakfast cereal on our chiropractor’s suggestion with a little butter and a squidge of maple syrup. It tastes surprisingly good – like waffles.

It’s a triumph for healthy heating!

…T’s just glad to go back to disagreeing with Josh.